There was kind of a thing in the last post's comments that made me finally come out and write this post.
Briefly, Steppy and his wife are just friends now. That is to say that they're mommy and daddy, they dont fight, they're great with each other's company, but there is no romantic love there (and if you ask me maybe there never was.) I know people who have less than that and they still function.
Interestingly enough, a question posed by my good friend Liz In Seattle (who will now rate this post 5 stars because I mentioned her) was "If you had to cancel one part of your relationship out completely, which would it be: sex or friendship?"
Hands down I'd toss the sex and keep the friendship, and I know that I speak for both David and I, I dont even have to ask him. Truth be told, David and I are friends too, very very good friends, but there is romantic love and actual sex going on.
With Steppy, not so much.
And if he romantically loves anyone, he tells me, it's me.
So here's where I got to needing to write a whole post. Liz P, who is not Liz in Seattle (10 stars bitch) said that his children will grow up confused because after they go to sleep he comes over and hangs out with me.
This is where I might go off on a rant here.
I read this book to review for Eden Fantasys and it is called Open by Jenny Block. I chose to review it, it did not choose me like that big huge black dong that I stuck to the neighbor's front door. I wanted to read it because I wanted to know what this "open marriage" concept was all about. And David read the book when I was finished with it. And David wanted to read it again.
We were both shocked in the sense that we both related to what the author was saying so well that we went, oh my god, this is us. That's not to say that we're out fucking other people or that we're going to actively pursue something like that, but let me explain what I mean here.
Let's start with the virgin/whore complex. I've highlighted this little quip from the book:
"We want a lady in the street but a freak in the bed," Usher sings to his tween and teen fans in his song "Yeah!" Notice that it has nothing to do with what she wants--just what he expects.
Do you see what's happening there in just that statement alone? Whatever is expected of people is absolutely a LEARNED response, whether Usher is singing it or a preacher is preaching it or your parents are living it. Now this next passage totally struck me hard, because after all of these years of trying to explain why I dont have a jealous fiber in my body, this fucking summed it up.
In their groundbreaking 1972 book Open Marriage, Nena and George O'Neill explain, "Jealousy is primarily a learned response, determined by cultural attitudes." We foster jealousy in ourselves by thinking we own someone, and that we can be everything in the world for that person. Then we become unhappy when we find that we cant." The entire idea of being sexually exclusive and wholly possessing our spouses, the O'Neill's point out, "breeds deep-rooted dependencies, infantile and childish emotions, and insecurities." What if, instead, we were to feel secure in our relationships and acknowledge our needs and our partner's needs? We would have greater security and acceptance in our relationships, and we would nurture trust and honesty instead of jealousy. As the saying goes, we reap what we sow.
How this relates to David and I is that we absolutely have nurtured very strong trust and honesty throughout our marriage, and never has jealousy been a factor. And it comes naturally. This isn't really about seeking other sexual partners, at the moment I mean, but our attitude has always been with each other like "just tell me, dont hide anything, just tell me."
I'll tell you something, early in our marriage David betrayed my trust. I kept finding evidence, and smelling evidence, that he was smoking. I confronted him on this many many times, and remember he was only 16 when we got married so of course it was also a matter of "who the hell is buying these for you?" But he wouldn't admit to it. After several months, finally he admitted it, and I was beyond pissed. Not only because I think it's a disgusting and selfish habit, but because he admitted that he was stealing them from Stater's where he worked at the time (he's already admitted this to the background investigator so I'm not exactly throwing him under the google-bus by mentioning this, it's no secret.) I was livid because he was putting his job on the line, and he was lying about it. This wasn't necessarily about fucking cigarettes, this was about betrayal and lying.
But he quit. Cold turkey. And he has never, ever lied like that again because he gets it now. He learned from his mistakes, and you know what, I learn from my mistakes too. I learned a very long time ago to just be honest because mistelling stories gets you nowhere fast. Just think about this, what if I never told David about Steppy trying to/successfully kissing me, or hitting on me, or letting him in on how physically close we are? I'd be hiding something, and hiding makes you guilty.
That one night when me and Steppy fell asleep on my bed, I mean fully clothed and innocent, do you think that I would have even risked doing something like that if I thought David was going to come home and rage, or worse, have hurt feelings about it?
And do you think that if any part of me and Steppy's friendship bothered David I would continue it?
I can still hear the echos in my head of my ex boyfriend accusing me of cheating with anyone I fucking talked to. Boys, girls, all of them. All of my friends, I was sleeping with them all. I was a whore, I was a liar, I was all that. I never wanted to have a relationship like that again, and so I told David very very early on, "just tell me, dont hide anything, just tell me."
The bottom line is that it's only cheating if it demands secrecy. In open relationships, people dont have to be repressed, and the people in the relationship dont have to disrespect one another by lying.
Now let's examine what all this has to do with me and Steppy, and Steppy and his wife, and Steppy and his kids.
This is beautiful, at the end of the book when the author says this in regards to her husband, who she loves but does not have a great sex life with because he's not nearly as horny as she is essentially, and her best friend/lover, who is a woman:
My marriage with Christopher and my relationship with Jemma are anything but mutually exclusive. They are perfect together. He is my rock and she is my sky. Never would we presume earth and air could fulfill our lives' differing needs in identical ways, and never would we expect to be able to live without one or the other. The same should be true of the people in our lives: Different people fulfill different wants and needs. It's not that complicated.
From his side of the spectrum it's easy to see that he needs intimacy with someone, and that someone is me. Sex aside, we're not talking about sex here, people can live without sex and more often than not they do. But he has his rock at home, a very good woman who he partners with well. But then between me and him, there could never be a partnership. Steppy has an air of superiority that I could never stomach as a full time job, where as with David, he's absolutely not intrigued by any kind of dominance or submission in real life or in bed because frankly it makes him nervous if I'm anything different than just his equal.
Cool huh?
Not always cool, but then again there's this big man who carries a gun and chews Trident and kicks me up the ass and tells me what to do on occasion. Maybe you've seen me on Twitter begging you to kick my ass and tell me to write 1,000 or more words on my manuscript. I need to be told what to do sometimes, and I hate asking for it, but I swear to god when Steppy called me and demanded that I finish writing Chelsea's Demon that night, I mean demanded it, I was done within an hour. The printed manuscript is being shipped to me as we speak.
David's more like, "do what makes you happy," tra la la la, which is awesome. But then books dont get finished. And I only started setting deadlines when Steppy started setting them for me.
I have serious daddy issues sometimes.
I think in a sense Steppy fulfills those. And yet, he can still be the loving, caring brother I should have had but didn't because I was born into douchebaggery. Except Robert, I love Robert. He's a good brother.
Steppy also fulfills something else for me though, and it's painstakingly obvious. He's attracted to me. And yes, it's shallow to need other people's attraction to us to prove our attractiveness to ourselves. But even though I'm fully aware of that fact, it's hard to forget it. Basically people, it feels god damned GREAT to be noticed and adored by someone.
And? When someone hits on David? I dont throw a nasty "back off my man!" stare, I look at them like "I know, right?"
And it's mutual, because Steppy will show up here in uniform on lunch just to do it. Not like he wiggles his butt in my face but he doesnt have to. He knows, and I know, that he would never do anything to disgrace the uniform. Oh but given the chance? I. would. disgrace. the. hell. out. of. that. uniform. And that, my friends, is why God invented strip clubs. Look but dont touch, and wowie wowzah!
I'm just a stay at home mom with a rockstar complex writing out books and charging $50 an hour for my photography skills. So many women in my position have to ask their husbands for permission to even go out with their friends, and case in point, when my ex's step mom invited me to go gambling with her she asked if my husband was willing to baby sit I said, "when he's their father it's called raising, not babysitting."
I'm happy to be the virgin and the whore, just like I had been before our marriage. There's nothing wrong with wanting to be both, as long as that urge comes from an authentic place and is not forced on you. I'm happy baking cookies--sometimes. I'm happy being dominant in bed--sometimes. Dealing with mixed messages and the shoulds and should nots surrounding relationships and sex is not about whether it works for the couple. I'm not talking about things that are quantifiably deviant, like bestiality or pedophilia or anything nonconsensual; I'm talking about two adults conducting their marriage honestly, in ways that are appropriate for them.
Is it sad that Steppy and his wife aren't in l-o-v-e? Yes, to me, but that's only because I want for my friend what I have. But what they do have works, and with the divorce rate the way it is, at least there's someone out there who figured out that it's not just about sex and love.
People look at marriage as the "right" choice, or alternately, as a moral or good choice, because it's assumed that human beings will be monogamous upon committing to this arrangement. Of course, more than ample proof exists that marriage does NOT enforce monogamy. Marriage was strictly about money until the last 100 or so years when "romantic love" was introduced into the equation. It wasn't about love or sex or finding "the one." It was about alliances and building labor force enough to run the farm.
I want to conclude with this though. Right, I told you all that to tell you this. Our children dont know what mommy and daddy do behind closed doors. We have a box full of things that would warp any child into their teen years, but we keep a lock on it. We dont hump on the kitchen counter at 3:00 in the afternoon with the kids running around. Sane people dont do that.
As for the argument that Steppy's kids will be warped because he goes and see's Jessie when they go to bed, again, how the hell will they know? We dont tell our kids everything, and they dont need to know everything. And for my kids at least, I hope that one day they'll be in a relationship that's solid enough that friendships can continue to go on even when "the one" is found.
Essentially, making all of this out to be taboo is only fanning the flames. There's nothing taboo going on here as of right now, Steppy and I aren't sleeping together, he isn't my "boyfriend" in the real sense of the word even though Liz in Seattle (15 stars, what now?) referred to him as my boyfriend once on the phone. I lol'd though, it's a made up title. If something were to ever, EVER, EVER happen, it would happen behind closed doors and it would have nothing to do with the kids. Why would they need to know?
Of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.
Encroaching upon scandal in 3...2...1...
